I was so angry with Steven Spielberg after I saw this movie. It had a perfectly good premise. A gorgeous horse named Joey and the poor English farm boy (Jeremy Irvine who looks like a young Tom Brady) who tamed and loved him, has to relinquish his pet to the brutality of World War I. Will the horse survive? Will the boy? There’s lush green countryside, golden sunsets, fighting soldiers, a great storyteller at the helm (Spielberg) and a beautiful, wonderful, noble chestnut horse with 4 white socks, who’s stronger than any horse ever was. I was all set to let myself go, big fat tears rolling down my cheeks. Hell– I couldn’t wait!
And then …it began to creep in like kudzu– great gobs of sentiment planted by the filmmaker that slowly, but surely began to take over every frame until I was choking on the stuff and couldn’t breathe, so embarrassed was I for the actors and the creature. I felt the first cringe coming on when we meet a too perfect, sickly young French farm girl and her sweet old grandfather–there’s a really sad back story about her dead parents– and of course her instantaneous bond with Joey. I was starting to feel a little queasy. (We never do find out what happened to that girl.)
Later, there are continually soldiers, sometimes bumbling, who decide to risk their lives for Joey at the drop of a bucket. OK, all right. I checked it off to good old-fashioned Capra-esque corn– for which I have a very high tolerance. When this all culminated in the most farfetched scene (that no one save ET could have imagined) between a German and a British soldier in the middle of a barbed wire hell of a battlefield, I thought I was done for. (How did so many wire cutters show up on cue, in the same place at the same time?) But I still had some fight left in me, until… until…
The war stops in its tracks as a phalanx of rag tag soldiers–apparently choreographed by Busby Berkeley– parts like the red sea, while a blindfolded soldier stumbles down the line whimpering “Joey … Joey..”
Then, and only then was I through.
Look. I love a good cry. I love horses, and old-fashioned family stories about heroism. But I do not need any filmmaker to have so little faith in me, and the material that he has to underscore, over-direct, and contort every scene to within an inch of its emotional life, in order to be sure I feel something. Spielberg leans so heavy and so hard, it was sickening instead of sweet, fake instead of true. Back off, Steve, and let the story live. And by the way, this story could have used a little fleshing out.
Horsefeathers, I say. Now that was good movie.










Joyce,
I totally agree. Almost every character except the boy had no clear motivation for giving a damn about the horse. I was done when the grandfather showed up after traveling for three days to get there. How did he know it was the same horse? Did he see it on CNN?
Great minds think alike!–NICE TO HEAR FROM YOU BILL!! And of course you are right about how the farmer couldn’t have possibly known it was the same horse!!! I missed that– and it’s a glaring hole!
From the trailers, I worried this might be the case, and so tried to dissuade family who wanted to see it over the holidays, and haven’t yet seen it, and likely won’t, unless perhaps on DVD or TV later. Thanks for helping me to avoid this kind of movie-going experience. Now, “The Artist” — which I saw for free with one of your tweeted links to passes — had emotion and attachment that were more sincere and real, and I loved it!
Hi Dave!
So glad I could help– although I hate to dissuade people from making up their own minds– my fantasy is that everybody see everything and then we all talk about it– I love the exchange! So glad you loved THE ARTIST– pretty unusual flick!
Thanks so much for subscribing to JoycesChoices.com!
Happy New Year!
Joyce